man and woman in an undifferentiated way, and their mere maleness and femaleness identify their respective roles. A man, just by virtue of his manhood, is called to lead for God. A woman, just by virtue of her womanhood, is called to help for God (“Male-Female Equality and Male Headship,” Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, 102). How do evangelical feminists fix Genesis 2 to accommodate their prejudice? Specifically, how do they deal with the phrase “helper suitable for him”? Aida Besancon